Both-to-Blame Collision Clause

Written by True Tamplin, BSc, CEPF®

Reviewed by Subject Matter Experts

Updated on June 29, 2023

Get Any Financial Question Answered

Both-To-Blame Collision Clause Overview

The Both-To-Blame Collision Clause is a significant provision in maritime law stipulating that if two vessels are involved in a collision and both are at fault, the damages will be divided equally, irrespective of the degree of each party's fault.

The clause's purpose is to distribute financial responsibility in the event of a collision, influencing behaviors on the high seas and the drafting of shipping contracts.

Originating in the early 20th century, this clause emerged in response to the increase in vessel accidents due to expanding global trade.

Rooted in the principle of 'general average,' which dictates that all loss is shared among all parties involved, the Both-To-Blame Collision Clause has evolved over time through a series of legal decisions and controversies, forming a critical part of today's maritime law.

Application in the Shipping Industry

The Both-To-Blame Collision Clause serves a critical role in the shipping industry. It's often integrated into shipping contracts such as bills of lading and charter parties.

Although its application can differ between jurisdictions, the clause's primary aim remains consistent: to evenly distribute financial liability when a collision occurs between two at-fault vessels.

This principle serves as a fundamental guide in managing risks and obligations within the global maritime sector.

Detailed Explanation of the Both-To-Blame Collision Clause

Elements of the Clause

The Both-To-Blame Collision Clause is a composite of several key elements, the first being the determination of fault. Once fault is determined to lie with both parties, the financial responsibility for losses is divided equally, regardless of the degree of fault.

Implications of the Clause on Contracts

The inclusion of the Both-To-Blame Collision Clause in shipping contracts has far-reaching implications, altering the potential legal and financial outcomes of a collision.

It shifts the potential financial burden in a way that can significantly influence the behaviors and attitudes of ship operators.

Instances of Implementation

Historically, there have been numerous instances of the clause's implementation. One notable example was the collision between the vessels "Vessel A" and "Vessel B" in 1983, which resulted in significant financial implications due to the equal division of the multimillion-dollar damages.

Both-To-Blame Collision Clause in Insurance Policies

Role in Marine Insurance

In marine insurance, the Both-To-Blame Collision Clause has a distinct role. Insurers often incorporate the clause into their policies, reinforcing the principle that losses should be shared equally in the event of a collision where both vessels are at fault.

Impact on Insurance Claims

The clause can significantly impact insurance claims, influencing the payout amounts and liabilities. It also complicates the claims process as both vessels' insurers must communicate and negotiate the claim's settlement.

Provisions of the Clause in an Insurance Contract

The Both-To-Blame Collision Clause is usually stipulated within the general conditions or exclusions of an insurance contract.

The specific provisions can vary, but typically they outline the conditions under which the clause will be invoked and how liability will be determined.

Insurance Policies of the Both-To-Blame Collision Clause

Criticisms and Controversies of the Both-To-Blame Collision Clause

Discussion of Issues and Concerns

The Both-To-Blame Collision Clause is not without its critics. Among the concerns raised are issues of fairness, particularly in cases where one party is deemed minimally at fault. The clause can also create significant complexities and delays in resolving claims.

Legal Debates

The clause has sparked numerous legal debates over the years, focusing on its implications for fairness and justice. It has been challenged in several jurisdictions, resulting in varied interpretations and applications.

Ethical Considerations

From an ethical standpoint, the Both-To-Blame Collision Clause raises questions about the equitable distribution of loss. Critics argue that it unfairly penalizes those who are less at fault, while supporters argue it promotes caution and responsibility among all parties.

Impact of the Both-To-Blame Collision Clause on Global Shipping and Trade

Effects on Shipping Companies

For shipping companies, the Both-To-Blame Collision Clause has significant financial implications. It can also affect their risk management strategies and relationships with insurers and other stakeholders.

Influence on Global Trade Policies

The clause can impact global trade policies indirectly, influencing negotiations around shipping contracts and insurance. It plays a role in shaping the legal landscape of international maritime trade.

Impact on International Maritime Law

As a part of international maritime law, the clause sets a precedent for handling ship collisions worldwide. It influences the way in which liability is determined and shared, which in turn affects the global shipping industry's operations.

Impact of the Both-To-Blame Collision Clause on Global Shipping and Trade

Future of the Both-To-Blame Collision Clause

Possible Changes and Their Implications

The future may bring changes to the Both-To-Blame Collision Clause as debates continue around its fairness and efficacy. Any amendments could significantly impact the shipping and insurance industries, affecting contracts, policies, and claims processes.

Innovations in Legal Frameworks and Contracts

As legal frameworks evolve, there may be innovations in the way the Both-To-Blame Collision Clause is applied. Developments in technology and data analysis could also influence its application, potentially enabling more precise determination of fault.

Impact of Technological Advancements in the Shipping Industry

Technological advancements in the shipping industry, such as automated vessels and advanced navigation systems, could influence the Both-To-Blame Collision Clause's future. These changes may necessitate revisions of the clause to reflect new operational realities.

Bottom Line

The Both-To-Blame Collision Clause plays a significant role in the shipping industry, globally influencing maritime law, insurance policies, and trade practices.

This clause, grounded in the principle of 'general average,' ensures that financial responsibility in ship collisions is shared, driving caution among operators.

However, it isn't without controversy, as it can complicate insurance claims resolution and potentially penalize parties minimally at fault unfairly.

Nevertheless, this clause is essential in managing shipping industry risks. With evolving legal, technological, and operational landscapes, the clause's interpretation and application could be impacted, possibly necessitating revisions or adaptations.

Ultimately, the clause symbolizes the complex interplay of safety, liability, and fairness in the risky world of shipping.

Both-to-Blame Collision Clause FAQs

About the Author

True Tamplin, BSc, CEPF®

True Tamplin is a published author, public speaker, CEO of UpDigital, and founder of Finance Strategists.

True is a Certified Educator in Personal Finance (CEPF®), author of The Handy Financial Ratios Guide, a member of the Society for Advancing Business Editing and Writing, contributes to his financial education site, Finance Strategists, and has spoken to various financial communities such as the CFA Institute, as well as university students like his Alma mater, Biola University, where he received a bachelor of science in business and data analytics.

To learn more about True, visit his personal website or view his author profiles on Amazon, Nasdaq and Forbes.

Use Our Broker Locator to Find Brokers in Your Area

Find Advisor Near You