Common Reporting Standard (CRS)

Written by True Tamplin, BSc, CEPF®

Reviewed by Subject Matter Experts

Updated on July 12, 2023

Get Any Financial Question Answered

What Is the Common Reporting Standard (CRS)?

The Common Reporting Standard (CRS) is an international agreement designed to facilitate the automatic exchange of financial account information between participating jurisdictions.

Developed by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), CRS aims to increase transparency in global tax matters and combat tax evasion.

Tax authorities can more effectively identify and address tax evasion and fraud by sharing financial account information.

Before the implementation of the CRS, information exchange between countries primarily relied on the exchange of information on request.

This method proved insufficient in tackling global tax evasion, as it needed to be faster and often required extensive evidence to support the request.

The CRS was developed in response to the need for a more efficient and comprehensive approach to sharing financial account information. Its purpose is to enhance tax transparency, fight tax evasion, and promote fairness and integrity in the global tax system.

CRS Objectives

Enhancing Tax Transparency

The CRS promotes tax transparency by facilitating the automatic exchange of financial account information between participating jurisdictions.

Financial institutions must collect and report account holder information, which is then shared with tax authorities in the account holder's country of residence.

This increased transparency allows tax authorities to identify undeclared assets and income held in offshore accounts, ensuring taxpayers accurately report their financial affairs.

Combatting Tax Evasion and Tax Fraud

By sharing financial account information, the CRS makes it more difficult for individuals and entities to evade taxes by hiding assets and income in offshore accounts.

The automatic exchange of information makes it easier for tax authorities to detect and pursue tax evaders, reducing tax fraud opportunities.

Ultimately, this helps to ensure that taxpayers are paying their fair share of taxes and contributes to the overall fairness and integrity of the global tax system.

Common-Reporting-Standard-(CRS)-Objectives

Key Components of CRS

Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI)

At the heart of the CRS is the Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI), which refers to the systematic and periodic transmission of taxpayer information by the source jurisdiction to the taxpayer's jurisdiction of residence.

AEOI eliminates the need for specific information requests and allows tax authorities to receive financial account information on a regular basis. This streamlined process improves the efficiency and effectiveness of cross-border tax information exchange.

Due Diligence Procedures for Financial Institutions

Financial institutions play a critical role in implementing CRS, as they are responsible for conducting due diligence on their account holders.

This involves identifying reportable accounts, collecting account holder information, and reporting this information to the relevant tax authorities.

To ensure compliance, financial institutions must establish and maintain appropriate policies, procedures, and controls that enable them to identify and report the required information accurately.

Implementation of CRS

Stages of Implementation

The implementation of the CRS has taken place in stages, with early adopters commencing the exchange of information in 2017. These early adopters included several European Union (EU) member states and other jurisdictions committed to tax transparency.

Following the success of the early adopters, a wider group of jurisdictions began implementing CRS, with over 100 countries now participating in the automatic exchange of information.

Domestic Legislation and Regulations

To participate in the CRS, jurisdictions must implement domestic legislation and regulations that align with the CRS requirements.

This includes adopting due diligence procedures for financial institutions, reporting requirements, and mechanisms for exchanging information with other jurisdictions.

Once the necessary legislation and regulations are in place, jurisdictions can move forward with the automatic exchange of information under the CRS framework.

Due Diligence Procedures

Pre-existing Individual Accounts

Financial institutions must review their records for pre-existing individual accounts to identify any reportable accounts under CRS.

This involves determining the account holder's jurisdiction of residence based on available information, such as mailing addresses, telephone numbers, and tax identification numbers.

If an account is identified as reportable, the financial institution must collect the required information and report it to the relevant tax authority.

New Individual Accounts

For new individual accounts, financial institutions must obtain a self-certification from the account holder, including their residence jurisdiction and tax identification number.

The financial institution must validate this self-certification, and any discrepancies must be resolved before the account can be opened. If the account is deemed reportable, they must report the required information to the relevant tax authority.

Reporting Requirements

Financial Account Information to be Reported

Under the CRS, financial institutions are required to report specific information about their account holders and their financial accounts. This information includes:

  • Account Holder Information: Name, address, jurisdiction of residence, and tax identification number.

  • Account Balance or Value: The total balance or value of the account at the end of the reporting period.

  • Gross Proceeds from the Sale or Redemption of Financial Assets: Proceeds from the sale or redemption of assets held in the account.

Reporting Timeframe and Frequency

Financial institutions must report the required account information to their local tax authority annually.

The information is then shared with the account holder's jurisdiction of residence through the automatic exchange of information process.

This regular reporting helps to ensure that tax authorities have access to up-to-date information about their taxpayers' offshore financial accounts.

Participating Jurisdictions

Criteria for Participation

To participate in the CRS, jurisdictions must meet certain criteria, including implementing domestic legislation and regulations that align with the CRS requirements and establishing information exchange agreements with other participating jurisdictions.

Additionally, participating jurisdictions must demonstrate a commitment to tax transparency and be willing to share financial account information with other jurisdictions in accordance with the CRS framework.

List of Participating Jurisdictions

Over 100 countries are currently participating in the CRS, including major financial centers and emerging economies. The list of participating jurisdictions continues to grow as more countries commit to enhancing tax transparency and combating tax evasion.

The OECD regularly updates the list of participating jurisdictions on its website.

Non-participating Jurisdictions and Their Implications

Non-participating jurisdictions may face reputational risks and potential sanctions from other countries, as they are perceived to be less committed to tax transparency and the fight against tax evasion.

Additionally, financial institutions in participating jurisdictions must apply stricter due diligence procedures to accounts held by residents of non-participating jurisdictions, which may discourage investment and financial transactions with these countries.

Impact of CRS on Taxpayers and Financial Institutions

Compliance Requirements

Implementing CRS has increased compliance requirements for taxpayers and financial institutions.

Taxpayers must ensure that they accurately report their offshore financial accounts and income, while financial institutions must establish and maintain effective due diligence procedures and reporting systems.

Failure to comply with these requirements can result in penalties, fines, and reputational damage.

Penalties for Non-compliance

Non-compliance with the CRS can result in significant penalties for both taxpayers and financial institutions.

Taxpayers who fail to report their offshore financial accounts accurately and income may face increased scrutiny from tax authorities and fines and penalties for tax evasion.

Financial institutions that fail to comply with their due diligence and reporting obligations may also face fines, penalties, and reputational harm.

Criticisms and Controversies

Privacy and Data Protection Concerns

One of the primary criticisms of the CRS is the potential risk to personal privacy and data protection.

The automatic exchange of financial account information raises concerns about the security and confidentiality of sensitive personal data and the potential for misuse by tax authorities or other parties.

To address these concerns, the OECD has established strict guidelines for protecting personal data. Participating jurisdictions must implement robust data security measures to ensure the confidentiality of the information exchanged.

Implementation Costs

Implementing the CRS has resulted in significant costs for financial institutions, as they must invest in new systems and processes to comply with the due diligence and reporting requirements.

This has raised concerns about the financial burden placed on smaller financial institutions and the potential for these costs to be passed on to customers through higher fees and charges.

Unintended Consequences

Some critics argue that the CRS may have unintended consequences, such as encouraging taxpayers to move their assets to non-participating jurisdictions or finding other ways to evade taxes.

Additionally, the increased compliance requirements and costs associated with CRS implementation may create barriers to entry for new financial institutions, potentially reducing competition and innovation in the financial sector.

Conclusion

The Common Reporting Standard (CRS) represents a significant step forward in the global effort to enhance tax transparency and combat tax evasion.

By facilitating the automatic exchange of financial account information between participating jurisdictions, the CRS enables tax authorities to more effectively identify and address tax evasion, thereby promoting fairness and integrity in the global tax system.

Despite the criticisms and challenges associated with its implementation, the CRS has notably impacted global tax transparency and fairness.

As more jurisdictions adopt the CRS and participate in the automatic exchange of information, the overall effectiveness of the CRS will likely continue to improve, creating a more equitable and transparent global tax environment.

Common Reporting Standard (CRS) FAQs

About the Author

True Tamplin, BSc, CEPF®

True Tamplin is a published author, public speaker, CEO of UpDigital, and founder of Finance Strategists.

True is a Certified Educator in Personal Finance (CEPF®), author of The Handy Financial Ratios Guide, a member of the Society for Advancing Business Editing and Writing, contributes to his financial education site, Finance Strategists, and has spoken to various financial communities such as the CFA Institute, as well as university students like his Alma mater, Biola University, where he received a bachelor of science in business and data analytics.

To learn more about True, visit his personal website or view his author profiles on Amazon, Nasdaq and Forbes.

Search for Local Tax Preparers

Find Advisor Near You