Sherman Antitrust Act

Written by True Tamplin, BSc, CEPF®

Reviewed by Subject Matter Experts

Updated on July 12, 2023

Get Any Financial Question Answered

What Is the Sherman Antitrust Act?

The Sherman Antitrust Act is a U.S. federal law enacted in 1890 that aims to prevent monopolies and promote competition in business.

The Act makes it illegal for businesses to engage in anti-competitive behavior, including price-fixing, market allocation, and monopolization.

The purpose of the Sherman Antitrust Act is to promote competition in business and prevent the formation of monopolies, which can harm consumers by limiting choice, driving up prices, and reducing innovation.

It aims to protect small businesses from unfair competition and to ensure a level playing field for all market participants.

The Sherman Antitrust Act was passed during a period of rapid industrialization and consolidation in the U.S. economy.

At the time, many large corporations, such as Standard Oil and U.S. Steel, were able to dominate their industries and stifle competition through various anti-competitive practices.

Such act was one of several measures introduced during this period to address these concerns and promote greater competition in business.

Overview of the Sherman Antitrust Act

Key Provisions of the Act

The Sherman Antitrust Act contains three main provisions.

Section 1 makes it illegal for businesses to engage in anti-competitive agreements or practices, such as price-fixing or market allocation.

Section 2 makes it illegal to monopolize or attempt to monopolize any part of interstate commerce.

Section 3 allows for the recovery of damages by parties injured by violations of the Act.

Definition of Antitrust Violations

Antitrust violations include a wide range of anti-competitive practices, such as price-fixing, bid-rigging, market allocation, tying arrangements, and exclusive dealing.

These practices can harm competition and consumers by limiting choice, reducing innovation, and driving up prices.

Scope of the Act

The Sherman Antitrust Act applies to all forms of business, including corporations, partnerships, and sole proprietorships, and covers all forms of interstate commerce. The Act also applies to foreign businesses that engage in anti-competitive practices in the U.S.

Impact of the Sherman Antitrust Act

Effect on Businesses

The Sherman Antitrust Act has had a significant impact on businesses in the U.S. by promoting greater competition and preventing the formation of monopolies.

The Act has helped to level the playing field for smaller businesses and has encouraged innovation and entrepreneurship.

Effect on Competition

The Sherman Antitrust Act has had a positive effect on competition by preventing anti-competitive practices such as price-fixing and market allocation.

This has helped to promote greater choice for consumers and has encouraged businesses to compete on the basis of price, quality, and innovation.

Effect on Consumers

The Sherman Antitrust Act has had a positive effect on consumers by promoting greater competition and preventing the formation of monopolies.

This has helped to ensure that consumers have a wider range of choices and have access to goods and services at competitive prices.

Impact of the Sherman Antitrust Act on Businesses, Competition, and Consumers

Enforcement of the Sherman Antitrust Act

Role of the Department of Justice

The Department of Justice is responsible for enforcing the Sherman Antitrust Act and has the authority to investigate and prosecute violations of the Act. The Department of Justice can bring civil or criminal charges against businesses that engage in anti-competitive behavior.

Role of the Federal Trade Commission

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) also has the authority to enforce the Sherman Antitrust Act and can investigate and prosecute violations of the Act.

The FTC is responsible for promoting competition and protecting consumers, and it works to prevent anti-competitive behavior through education, advocacy, and enforcement.

Role of Private Parties

Private parties can also bring lawsuits under the Sherman Antitrust Act to recover damages for anti-competitive behavior.

Private parties can bring both civil and criminal lawsuits and can recover treble damages (three times the actual damages) if they can prove that they were harmed by an antitrust violation.

Enforcement of Sherman Antitrust Act

Criticisms of the Sherman Antitrust Act

Arguments Against Antitrust Regulation

Some critics of the Sherman Antitrust Act argue that antitrust regulation is unnecessary and can even be harmful to the economy. They argue that competition is self-regulating and that government intervention in the market can lead to unintended consequences.

Criticisms of Specific Provisions of the Act

Critics of the Sherman Antitrust Act have also raised specific criticisms of the Act's provisions. For example, some argue that the Act's prohibition on monopolization is too broad and can be used to punish businesses that are simply successful in the market.

Others argue that the Act's prohibition on price-fixing can be overly restrictive and can prevent businesses from engaging in legitimate pricing strategies.

Alternatives to Antitrust Regulation

Some critics of the Sherman Antitrust Act have suggested alternative approaches to promoting competition and preventing anti-competitive behavior.

For example, some suggest that the government should focus on reducing barriers to entry for new businesses rather than trying to regulate the behavior of existing businesses.

Bottom Line

The Sherman Antitrust Act is a U.S. federal law that aims to prevent monopolies and promote competition in business.

The Act makes it illegal for businesses to engage in anti-competitive behavior, including price-fixing, market allocation, and monopolization.

The Sherman Antitrust Act contains three main provisions and applies to all forms of business and all forms of interstate commerce. It made a significant impact on promoting greater competition and preventing the formation of monopolies.

Similarly, the act has had a positive impact on businesses, competition, and consumers but has also been subject to criticism.

Critics argue that antitrust regulation is unnecessary or can be harmful to the economy, and have raised specific criticisms of the Act's provisions. Alternatives to antitrust regulation have also been suggested.

Sherman Antitrust Act FAQs

About the Author

True Tamplin, BSc, CEPF®

True Tamplin is a published author, public speaker, CEO of UpDigital, and founder of Finance Strategists.

True is a Certified Educator in Personal Finance (CEPF®), author of The Handy Financial Ratios Guide, a member of the Society for Advancing Business Editing and Writing, contributes to his financial education site, Finance Strategists, and has spoken to various financial communities such as the CFA Institute, as well as university students like his Alma mater, Biola University, where he received a bachelor of science in business and data analytics.

To learn more about True, visit his personal website or view his author profiles on Amazon, Nasdaq and Forbes.

Meet Top Certified Financial Advisors Near You